#6 Large number of small plans vs small number of large plans

Number 6 in a series of headscratchers about SIPP capital adequacy proposals

A SIPP operator that has 10 clients with an average fund size of £400,000 will have the same proposed Initial Capital Requirement as a SIPP operator with 100 clients with an average fund size of £40,000.

However the larger SIPP operator (with more plans) should arguably hold more financial resources as there are more individuals to communicate with in the event of a wind-down and the cost of transferring an asset is not-linked to the value of that asset.

Using AUA as a measure of risk of consumer harm is flawed as it does not distinguish between these two situations.

I'd love to hear your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s